历代iPhone相机对比评测

Rotterdam does have a nice underground system which was perfect for our third test. The 5s has an overall decent noise handling, but couldn't keep up with the other phones. Beginning with the 6 everything started looking crisper. It's a head to head race between the 6s+ and the 6+ at the end - the 6s can't quite match their level of detail.

iPhone 6s+ 拍摄|后期应用: SKRWT, SNAPSEED, VSCO

第三轮：地下摄影 - 放大到 100% 显示，使用三脚架拍摄但未进行后期编辑

鹿特丹出众的地下运输系统为我们的第三轮测试提供了合适的场地。5s 在噪点控制方面总体良好，但是和其他的对比来看还是有差距的。从 6 开始，一切表现的都较为满意了。从 6+ 到 6s+，整体水平稳步上升。但是在我看来，6s 并没有达到它应有的水平。

4，Underground - 100% and unedited - handheld but stabilized

Hands and pants down- the 6s+ smashed everything in this shot - it took an image so much brighter and gave me a little "wow" moment. The 6s could not catch me as much as the 6+ and the 6 got the least good noise handling of the 6-series, but managed to snap a crips image.

iPhone 6s+ 拍摄|后期应用: SKRWT, SNAPSEED, VSCO

第四轮：地下摄影 - 放大到 100% 显示，手持拍摄但未进行后期编辑

6s+ 在这一轮的拍摄中让我惊讶，照片看起来更好也更为明亮。6 及 6+ 在夜间噪点控制方面落后于 6s 及 6s+，但看起来仍然不错。

结论

iPhone 4s: outdated.

iPhone 5s: still working with a decent camera - reaches it's limit pretty fast when it gets a couple f-stops darker. BUT it's way smaller than the 6-series and that's a tremendous plus for me!